Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Background While summarized under the umbrella term “Parkinsonism”, several subtypes with different etiologies exist, including Parkinson’s Disease, Vascular Parkinsonism and Drug-induced Parkinsonism. However, evidence on their incidence and prevalence remains limited. Objectives To evaluate secular trends of incidence and prevalence of parkinsonism, Parkinson’s Disease, Vascular Parkinsonism, and Drug-induced Parkinsonism from 2007 to 2021 in the United Kingdom. Methods We used primary care data, Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD, from the United Kingdom. Individuals were included if they were registered from January 2007 to December 2021 with at least one year of prior observation. Incidence and prevalence were calculated on a yearly basis with 95% confidence intervals and then stratified by age and sex. Results From 2007 to 2019, the incidence of parkinsonism and Parkinson’s Disease decreased, with Parkinson’s Disease incidence dropping from 35.86 (95% confidence interval: 34.22 – 37.56) to 31.40 (29.40 – 33.50) per 100,000 person-years. The prevalence of parkinsonism and Parkinson’s Disease increased from 0.22% (0.22% - 0.23%) and 0.21% (0.21% - 0.22%) in 2007 to peak in 2016 with 0.25% (0.25% - 0.26%) and 0.23% (0.23% - 0.24%) respectively. The number of Vascular Parkinsonism diagnoses have increased from 2010, whereas incidence and prevalence of Drug-induced Parkinsonism remained stable. Incidence and prevalence increased with age and were generally higher in males, except for Drug-induced Parkinsonism, which was slightly higher in females. Conclusions Given its association with aging, parkinsonism and these subtypes continue to present an increasing challenge to our aging society.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.