SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Neuroprotective activities of sertraline, tiagabine, and bicifadine with autophagy-inducing potentials in a 6-hydroxidopamine-treated Parkinson’s disease cell model

· 2024-11-11

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5357365/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disease characterized by the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. The development of effective neuroprotective therapies is crucial for mitigating the devastating effects of PD, and autophagy induction has recently emerged as a promising neuroprotective strategy. This study aimed to identify autophagy-inducing compounds and evaluate their neuroprotective activity in the chemical library. Among 3,200 chemicals consisting of FDA-approved drugs or are being evaluated in clinical trials, 547 chemicals indicating CNS diseases were filtered in, and 3 compounds (sertraline, tiagabine and bicifadine) were finally identified to exhibit the autophagy-inducing activity and the neuroprotective activity in 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced PC12 neuronal damaged PD model. Furthermore, Neurochemical profiling also revealed that 3 chemicals alleviated 6-OHDA-induced neurochemical pathway disruptions in PC12 cells. In conclusion, sertraline, tiagabine, and bicifadine, not only exhibited autophagy-inducing potential but also demonstrated significant neuroprotective activity with the change of neurochemical profiles against 6-OHDA-induced neurotoxicity in PD model, suggesting that 3 autophagy-inducing chemicals could be repositioned for PD to protect the neuronal cells.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.