SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Characterising Anticipatory Postural Adjustments in Turning: A Comparison Between Healthy Older Adults and People with Parkinson’s Disease

· 2025-03-12

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6172807/v1

Open accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) are crucial for maintaining postural stability during voluntary movements such as gait initiation. While APAs have been extensively studied in forward stepping, little is known about their characteristics during turning initiation. This study aimed to identify the characteristics of (i) APAs and subsequent first steps during turning in healthy older adults (HOA) and (ii) compare them to people with Parkinson’s (pwPD). Thirty-six pwPD (tested on medication) and 24 HOA performed self-paced uncontrived 360˚ turns which were embedded in a complex walking task. APAs and first step characteristics were recorded using motion capture and force plate data. For pwPD, APAs in turning were found to be primarily mediolateral, and of significantly reduced amplitude (median = .0065, 95% CI[.0053; .0089]) in comparison to HOA (median = .0110, 95% CI[.0073; .0181]). Unlike HOA there was no significant association between APAs and step characteristics. These findings suggest that APAs during turning are significantly impaired in pwPD, even when tested ON medication, and that this impairment may contribute to the turning difficulties often experienced by this population. Overall, these results have potential implications for clinical assessments and rehabilitation interventions, emphasising the need to tailor strategies to address turning challenges pwPD face in their daily life.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.