NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc0
Background Hereditary ataxias are genetically diverse, yet up to 75% remain undiagnosed due to technological and financial barriers. A pathogenic ZFHX3 GGC repeat expansion was recently linked to spinocerebellar ataxia type 4 (SCA4), characterized by progressive ataxia and sensory neuropathy, with all reported cases in individuals of Northern European ancestry. Methods We performed Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) genome long-read sequencing (>115 GB per sample) on a total of 15 individuals from Chile; 14 patients with suspected hereditary movement disorders and one unrelated family member. Variants were identified using PEPPER-Margin-DeepVariant 0.8 (SNVs), Sniffles 2.4 (SVs), and Vamos 2.1.3 (STRs). Ancestry was inferred using GenoTools with reference data from the 1000 Genomes Project, Human Genome Diversity Project, and an Ashkenazi Jewish panel. Haplotype analysis was conducted by phasing SNVs within ZFHX3 , and methylation profiling was performed with modbamtools. Results We identified ZFHX3 GGC repeat expansions (47–55 repeats) in four individuals with progressive ataxia, polyneuropathy, and vermis atrophy. One case presented parkinsonism–ataxia, expanding the phenotype. Longer expansions correlated with earlier onset and greater severity. Hypermethylation was detected on the expanded allele, and haplotype analysis linked ultra-rare ZFHX3 variants to distant Swedish ancestry. Conclusion This is the first report of SCA4 outside Northern Europe, confirming a shared founder haplotype and expansion instability. The presence of parkinsonism broadens the clinical spectrum. Comprehensive genetic testing across diverse populations is crucial, and long-read sequencing enhances diagnostic yield by detecting repeat expansions and SNVs in a single assay.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.