Araştırma özeti
Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by
Background/Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) for advanced stages, targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or the internal globus pallidus (GPi). Despite DBS's symptomatic benefits, cerebrovascular events (CVEs) remain a concern. This study assessed CVE risk in PD patients undergoing DBS. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies published between 2014 and 2024 that reported CVEs in PD patients treated with DBS-STN or DBS-GPi were included. Data on CVEs, DBS targets, perioperative period, and microelectrode recording (MER) use were extracted, and probability proportions were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: Twenty-three studies (4795 patients) were included. The overall CVE probability was 2.71% (95% CI: 2.27-3.18%). Descriptive probabilities were 2.56% (95% CI: 1.94-3.24%) for STN and 0.93% (95% CI: 0.00-3.08%) for GPi. Hemorrhagic events were most common (STN: 2.47%; GPi: 1.98%), while ischemic events were rare (STN: 0.07%; GPi: 1.98%). Note that GPi estimates are based on a considerably smaller population and should be interpreted with caution. Postoperative CVEs (1.74%) were more frequent than intraoperative events (0.17%), and MER use did not significantly alter risk (MER: 2.89% vs. NON-MER: 2.92%). Conclusions: Our results suggest that DBS in PD is associated with a relatively low CVE risk (~2.7%), with hemorrhage being the most frequent type; CVEs remain a potential risk factor. Comprehensive evaluation of patient-specific factors and further prospective studies focusing on CVE outcomes are essential to optimize DBS safety in managing PD.
Bilimsel değerlendirme
Araştırma sorusu
Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.
Yöntem ve örneklem
Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.
Temel bulgular
Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.
Sınırlılıklar
Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.
Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.