Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Background/Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) for advanced stages, targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or the internal globus pallidus (GPi). Despite DBS's symptomatic benefits, cerebrovascular events (CVEs) remain a concern. This study assessed CVE risk in PD patients undergoing DBS. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies published between 2014 and 2024 that reported CVEs in PD patients treated with DBS-STN or DBS-GPi were included. Data on CVEs, DBS targets, perioperative period, and microelectrode recording (MER) use were extracted, and probability proportions were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: Twenty-three studies (4795 patients) were included. The overall CVE probability was 2.71% (95% CI: 2.27-3.18%). Descriptive probabilities were 2.56% (95% CI: 1.94-3.24%) for STN and 0.93% (95% CI: 0.00-3.08%) for GPi. Hemorrhagic events were most common (STN: 2.47%; GPi: 1.98%), while ischemic events were rare (STN: 0.07%; GPi: 1.98%). Note that GPi estimates are based on a considerably smaller population and should be interpreted with caution. Postoperative CVEs (1.74%) were more frequent than intraoperative events (0.17%), and MER use did not significantly alter risk (MER: 2.89% vs. NON-MER: 2.92%). Conclusions: Our results suggest that DBS in PD is associated with a relatively low CVE risk (~2.7%), with hemorrhage being the most frequent type; CVEs remain a potential risk factor. Comprehensive evaluation of patient-specific factors and further prospective studies focusing on CVE outcomes are essential to optimize DBS safety in managing PD.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.