SCIENTIFIC HUB

Araştırmanın izini sürün.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Serious games and virtual reality in Parkinson's disease rehabilitation: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Parkinsonism Relat Disord · 2026-06-30

DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2026.108408PMID: 42385285

Erişim kaynaktan kontrol edilmeliSystematic Review; Journal ArticleKaynağa git ↗

Araştırma özeti

Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by

BackgroundSerious games (SG) and virtual reality (VR) are emerging rehabilitation tools in Parkinson's disease (PD); however, clinical evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains heterogeneous.ObjectiveTo systematically review RCTs evaluating SG and VR-based rehabilitation on motor and cognitive outcomes in PD.MethodsPRISMA 2020-compliant search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus (January 2015-January 2025), augmented with visuomotor-adaptation search terms. RCTs involving adults with idiopathic PD using SG or VR versus conventional rehabilitation were included. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0.ResultsEleven RCTs (N = 242; Hoehn-Yahr I-III) were included. Balance (BBS), gait speed (10MWT), and mobility (TUG) improved consistently. UPDRS-III improvements were observed with protocols ≥8 weeks. Three trials reported significant gains in executive function and attention. Adherence was high and no serious adverse events were reported.ConclusionsSG and VR-based rehabilitation are safe, feasible, and effective adjuncts to conventional therapy for improving balance, gait, and selected cognitive domains in PD. Standardized protocols and long-term follow-up are needed.

Bilimsel değerlendirme

01

Araştırma sorusu

Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.

02

Yöntem ve örneklem

Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.

03

Temel bulgular

Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.

04

Sınırlılıklar

Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.

Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.