SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Serious games and virtual reality in Parkinson's disease rehabilitation: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Parkinsonism Relat Disord · 2026-06-30

DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2026.108408PMID: 42385285

Check source for accessSystematic Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundSerious games (SG) and virtual reality (VR) are emerging rehabilitation tools in Parkinson's disease (PD); however, clinical evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains heterogeneous.ObjectiveTo systematically review RCTs evaluating SG and VR-based rehabilitation on motor and cognitive outcomes in PD.MethodsPRISMA 2020-compliant search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus (January 2015-January 2025), augmented with visuomotor-adaptation search terms. RCTs involving adults with idiopathic PD using SG or VR versus conventional rehabilitation were included. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0.ResultsEleven RCTs (N = 242; Hoehn-Yahr I-III) were included. Balance (BBS), gait speed (10MWT), and mobility (TUG) improved consistently. UPDRS-III improvements were observed with protocols ≥8 weeks. Three trials reported significant gains in executive function and attention. Adherence was high and no serious adverse events were reported.ConclusionsSG and VR-based rehabilitation are safe, feasible, and effective adjuncts to conventional therapy for improving balance, gait, and selected cognitive domains in PD. Standardized protocols and long-term follow-up are needed.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.