Araştırma özeti
Aşağıdaki metin kaynak makalenin lisansı doğrulanmış orijinal özetidir. cc by
PurposeTo determine the feasibility of measuring brain clearance of gadolinium contrast agent using standard intravenous DCE-MRI acquisitions and evaluate the contribution of blood-brain barrier (BBB) and non-BBB clearance routes.MethodsUptake and extended Tofts models were fit to DCE-MRI data from people with Parkinson's disease, post-stroke and controls. Models were compared using the Akaike information criterion. Key parameters (Ktrans, vp, ve, and k) were extracted from gray and white matter ROIs. In mice, two-photon microscopy of intravenously injected Sulforhodamine 101 was used to confirm small tracer clearance kinetics without the confounds of partial volume effects or water exchange.ResultsThe extended Tofts model provided a superior fit compared to all uptake-only models. Extended Tofts estimates of the extravascular extracellular volume fraction ve were underestimated by a factor of 10-20 compared to known literature values (1.5% vs. 20%-30%). We hypothesized this bias may be due to an additional competing non-BBB clearance mechanism not accounted for by the extended Tofts model. In both MRI and two-photon data, we found that ve estimates trended toward literature values as BBB permeability (and thus BBB clearance) increased, supporting our hypothesis.ConclusionModeling clearance of extravasated contrast agent from the brain improves fit quality compared to models that neglect clearance. Estimates of interstitial volume fraction were underestimated at low Ktrans but tended toward literature values as BBB permeability (and clearance) increased. This study indicates that estimating brain clearance of contrast agent using DCE-MRI is feasible, and that estimates reflect a combination of BBB and non-BBB clearance pathways.
Bilimsel değerlendirme
Araştırma sorusu
Sorunun kapsamı orijinal çalışma üzerinden değerlendirilir.
Yöntem ve örneklem
Çalışma tasarımı ve örneklem için kaynak makaleyi kontrol edin.
Temel bulgular
Bu kayıt için editoryal olarak onaylanmış bulgu özeti henüz yayımlanmadı.
Sınırlılıklar
Sonuçların genellenebilirliği, yanlılık ve klinik anlamı ayrıca incelenmelidir.
Bibliyografik veriden yöntem, örneklem veya klinik sonuç çıkarımı yapılmaz.