SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

tau Exon 10 expression involves a bipartite intron 10 regulatory sequence and weak 5' and 3' splice sites.

J Biol Chem · 2002-05-08

DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m203794200PMID: 12000767

Check source for accessResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

tau mutations that deregulate alternative exon 10 (E10) splicing cause frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism chromosome 17-type by several mechanisms. Previously we showed that E10 splicing involved exon splicing enhancer sequences at the 5' and 3' ends of E10, an exon splicing silencer, a weak 5' splice site, and an intron splicing silencer (ISS) within intron 10 (I10). Here, we identify additional regulatory sequences in I10 using both non-neuronal and neuronal cells. The ISS sequence extends from I10 nucleotides 11-18, which is sufficient to inhibit use of a weakened 5' splice site of a heterologous exon. Furthermore, ISS function is location-independent but requires proximity to a weak 5' splice site. Thus, the ISS functions as a linear sequence. A new cis-acting element, the intron splicing modulator (ISM), was identified immediately downstream of the ISS at I10 positions 19-26. The ISM and ISS form a bipartite regulatory element, within which the ISM functions when the ISS is present, mitigating E10 repression by the ISS. Additionally, the 3' splice site of E10 is weak and requires exon splicing enhancer elements for efficient E10 inclusion. Thus far, tau FTDP-17 splicing mutations affect six predicted cis-regulatory sequences.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.