SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Structural organization of alpha-synuclein fibrils studied by site-directed spin labeling.

J Biol Chem · 2003-06-18

DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m305266200PMID: 12815044

Check source for accessResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Despite its importance in Parkinson's disease, a detailed understanding of the structure and mechanism of alpha-synuclein fibril formation remains elusive. In this study, we used site-directed spin labeling and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy to study the structural features of monomeric and fibrillar alpha-synuclein. Our results indicate that monomeric alpha-synuclein, in solution, has a highly dynamic structure, in agreement with the notion that alpha-synuclein is a natively unfolded protein. In contrast, fibrillar aggregates of alpha-synuclein exhibit a distinct domain organization. Our data identify a highly ordered and specifically folded central core region of approximately 70 amino acids, whereas the N terminus is structurally more heterogeneous and the C terminus ( approximately 40 amino acids) is completely unfolded. Interestingly, the central core region of alpha-synuclein exhibits several features reminiscent of those observed in the core region of fibrillar Alzheimer's amyloid beta peptide, including an in-register parallel structure. Although the lengths of the respective core regions differ, fibrils from different amyloid proteins nevertheless appear to be able to take up highly similar, and possibly conserved, structures.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.