SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Selective detection, quantification, and subcellular location of alpha-synuclein aggregates with a protein aggregate filtration assay.

Biotechniques · 2008-03-01

DOI: 10.2144/000112691PMID: 18361794

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and multiple system atrophy are caused by alpha-synuclein aggregates. At present, there is no good biochemical method defining alpha-synuclein aggregates formed in vivo versus oligomers as a means to investigate alpha-synuclein aggregation and its mechanisms of neurodegeneration. A simple method, therefore, for the selective and sensitive detection of alpha-synuclein aggregates suited for screening purposes would be useful. Since in contrast to prions a proper detection of alpha-synuclein aggregates by Western blot analysis is difficult, we developed a protein aggregate filtration (PAF) assay. It takes advantage of the inherent insolubility of aggregated alpha-synuclein using microfiltration to separate it from soluble isoforms. For the first time, this assay even makes quantitative comparisons possible. We describe how the PAF assay can be applied to human brain tissue and animal and cell culture models, as well as used as a screening method for the subcellular location of alpha-synuclein aggregates. Since it detects the pathological isoform instead of surrogate markers, the PAF assay may have also potential in diagnosis of PD and DLB.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.