SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Comparative analysis of different peptidyl-prolyl isomerases reveals FK506-binding protein 12 as the most potent enhancer of alpha-synuclein aggregation.

J Biol Chem · 2011-06-07

DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m110.182303PMID: 21652707

Check source for accessComparative Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

FK506-binding proteins (FKBPs) are members of the immunophilins, enzymes that assist protein folding with their peptidyl-prolyl isomerase (PPIase) activity. Some non-immunosuppressive inhibitors of these enzymes have neuroregenerative and neuroprotective properties with an unknown mechanism of action. We have previously shown that FKBPs accelerate the aggregation of α-synuclein (α-SYN) in vitro and in a neuronal cell culture model for synucleinopathy. In this study we investigated whether acceleration of α-SYN aggregation is specific for the FKBP or even the PPIase family. Therefore, we studied the effect of several physiologically relevant PPIases, namely FKBP12, FKBP38, FKBP52, FKBP65, Pin1, and cyclophilin A, on α-SYN aggregation in vitro and in neuronal cell culture. Among all PPIases tested in vitro, FKBP12 accelerated α-SYN aggregation the most. Furthermore, only FKBP12 accelerated α-SYN fibril formation at subnanomolar concentrations, pointing toward an enzymatic effect. Although stable overexpression of various FKBPs enhanced the aggregation of α-SYN and cell death in cell culture, they were less potent than FKBP12. When FKBP38, FKBP52, and FKBP65 were overexpressed in a stable FKBP12 knockdown cell line, they could not fully restore the number of α-SYN inclusion-positive cells. Both in vitro and cell culture data provide strong evidence that FKBP12 is the most important PPIase modulating α-SYN aggregation and validate the protein as an interesting drug target for Parkinson disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.