Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Cerebral dopamine neurotrophic factor (CDNF) is a promising therapeutic agent for Parkinson disease. As such, there has been great interest in studying its mode of action, which remains unknown. The three-dimensional crystal structure of the N terminus (residues 9-107) of CDNF has been determined, but there have been no published structural studies on the full-length protein due to proteolysis of its C-terminal domain, which is considered intrinsically disordered. An improved purification protocol enabled us to obtain active full-length CDNF and to determine its three-dimensional structure in solution. CDNF contains two well folded domains (residues 10-100 and 111-157) that are linked by a loop of intermediate flexibility. We identified two surface patches on the N-terminal domain that were characterized by increased conformational dynamics that should allow them to embrace active sites. One of these patches is formed by residues Ser-33, Leu-34, Ala-66, Lys-68, Ile-69, Leu-70, Ser-71, and Glu-72. The other includes a flexibly disordered N-terminal tail (residues 1-9), followed by the N-terminal portion of α-helix 1 (residues Cys-11, Glu-12, Val-13, Lys-15, and Glu-16) and residue Glu-88. The surface of the C-terminal domain contains two conserved active sites, which have previously been identified in mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor, a CDNF paralog, which corresponds to its intracellular mode of action. We also showed that CDNF was able to protect dopaminergic neurons against injury caused by α-synuclein oligomers. This advises its use against physiological damages caused by α-synuclein oligomers, as observed in Parkinson disease and several other neurodegenerative diseases.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.