SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Cholinesterase Inhibitors for Lewy Body Disorders: A Meta-Analysis.

Int J Neuropsychopharmacol · 2015-07-28

DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv086PMID: 26221005

Open accessMeta-Analysis; research-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundWe performed a meta-analysis of cholinesterase inhibitors for patients with Lewy body disorders, such as Parkinson's disease, Parkinson's disease dementia, and dementia with Lewy bodies.MethodsThe meta-analysis included only randomized controlled trials of cholinesterase inhibitors for Lewy body disorders.ResultsSeventeen studies (n = 1798) were assessed. Cholinesterase inhibitors significantly improved cognitive function (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.53], behavioral disturbances (SMD = -0.28), activities of daily living (SMD = -0.28), and global function (SMD = -0.52) compared with control treatments. Changes in motor function were not significantly different from control treatments. Furthermore, the cholinesterase inhibitor group had a higher all-cause discontinuation (risk ratio [RR] = 1.48, number needed to harm [NNH] = 14), discontinuation due to adverse events (RR = 1.59, NNH = 20), at least one adverse event (RR = 1.13, NNH = 11), nausea (RR = 2.50, NNH = 13), and tremor (RR = 2.30, NNH = 20).ConclusionsCholinesterase inhibitors appear beneficial for the treatment of Lewy body disorders without detrimental effects on motor function. However, a careful monitoring of treatment compliance and side effects is required.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.