Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundMany in vivo studies have shown a difference in pre- and/or postsynaptic imaging between Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy; however, time course differences in pre- and postsynaptic imaging between Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy have not been rigorously investigated.Case presentationWe report serial positron emission tomography images of both dopamine transporters and dopamine D2 receptors, obtained from a Japanese patient with Parkinson's disease who underwent positron emission tomography scanning at ages 71, 72, 74, and 75 years, and another Japanese patient with multiple system atrophy who underwent positron emission tomography scanning at ages 65, 66, and 67 years. Volumes-of-interest were placed on the striatal subregions. The percentage decreases between the first and last images showed that dopamine transporter availability decreased with disease progression in both patients, but that dopamine D2 receptor availability decreased only in the patient with multiple system atrophy. A partial correlation analysis between dopamine transporter and dopamine D2 receptor availability, controlling for the effects of striatal subregional differences, revealed a positive correlation in the patient with multiple system atrophy (r = 0.893, P = 0.0002), but no significant correlation in the patient with Parkinson's disease (r = -0.036, P = 0.89).ConclusionsThe time course of pre- and postsynaptic imaging can be considerably different between Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy, and may be useful in improving the accuracy of discrimination between Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.