SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

New compounds identified through in silico approaches reduce the α-synuclein expression by inhibiting prolyl oligopeptidase in vitro.

Sci Rep · 2017-09-07

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11302-0PMID: 28883518

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Prolyl oligopeptidase (POP) is a serine protease that is responsible for the maturation and degradation of short neuropeptides and peptide hormones. The inhibition of POP has been demonstrated in the treatment of α-synucleinopathies and several neurological conditions. Therefore, ligand-based and structure-based pharmacophore models were generated and validated in order to identify potent POP inhibitors. Pharmacophore-based and docking-based virtual screening of a drug-like database resulted in 20 compounds. The in vitro POP assays indicated that the top scoring compounds obtained from virtual screening, Hit 1 and Hit 2 inhibit POP activity at a wide range of concentrations from 0.1 to 10 µM. Moreover, treatment of the hit compounds significantly reduced the α-synuclein expression in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells, that is implicated in Parkinson's disease. Binding modes of Hit 1 and Hit 2 compounds were explored through molecular dynamics simulations. A detailed investigation of the binding interactions revealed that the hit compounds exhibited hydrogen bond interactions with important active site residues and greater electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions compared to those of the reference inhibitors. Finally, our findings indicated the potential of the identified compounds for the treatment of synucleinopathies and CNS related disorders.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.