SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Nigrosome 1 visibility at susceptibility weighted 7T MRI-A dependable diagnostic marker for Parkinson's disease or merely an inconsistent, age-dependent imaging finding?

PLoS One · 2017-10-10

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185489PMID: 29016618

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundVisualisation of nigrosome 1, a substructure of the healthy substantia nigra, was restricted in susceptibility weighted MR imaging in almost all patients with Parkinson's disease studied so far. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of visibility of this substructure in subjects without Parkinson's disease and to examine the potential link between increasing brain iron accumulation with age and its detectability.MethodsIn 46 subjects (21 women, 25 men; 19 to 75 y; mean age: 44.5; SD: 15.6) examined with susceptibility weighted MR imaging at 7T visibility of nigrosome 1 was rated and classified. We assessed differences related to age and to signal intensities in the substantia nigra, red nucleus and putamen as correlates of the individual iron concentration.ResultsIn 93% nigrosome 1was at least unilaterally clearly present. In 24% at least one-sided limited visibility was observed. Using predefined classification criteria the specificity of the visibility across all age groups reached approximately 94%. We found no correlation with increasing iron concentrations with age.ConclusionAging with a related increase in iron concentration probably does not affect the visibility of nigrosome 1 at 7T SWI MRI. Our results support the role of this feature as a future differential diagnostic tool but further large-scale prospective studies are needed to better define the extent of a "limited visibility" to which an individual can be considered healthy.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.