SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

FDG PET Parkinson's disease-related pattern as a biomarker for clinical trials in early stage disease.

Neuroimage Clin · 2018-08-10

DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.08.006PMID: 30186761

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundThe development of therapeutic interventions for Parkinson disease (PD) is challenged by disease complexity and subjectivity of symptom evaluation. A Parkinson's Disease Related Pattern (PDRP) of glucose metabolism via fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been reported to correlate with motor symptom scores and may aid the detection of disease-modifying therapeutic effects.ObjectivesWe sought to independently evaluate the potential utility of the PDRP as a biomarker for clinical trials of early-stage PD.MethodsTwo machine learning approaches (Scaled Subprofile Model (SSM) and NPAIRS with Canonical Variates Analysis) were performed on FDG-PET scans from 17 healthy controls (HC) and 23 PD patients. The approaches were compared regarding discrimination of HC from PD and relationship to motor symptoms.ResultsBoth classifiers discriminated HC from PD (p 2 = 0.24, p 2 = 0.23, p 2 = 0.25, p 2 = 0.16, p ConclusionsTwo independent analyses performed in a cohort of mild PD patients replicated key features of the PDRP, confirming that FDG-PET and multivariate classification can provide an objective, sensitive biomarker of disease stage with the potential to detect treatment effects on PD progression.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.