SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

PET imaging of noradrenaline transporters in Parkinson's disease: focus on scan time.

Ann Nucl Med · 2018-10-06

DOI: 10.1007/s12149-018-1305-5PMID: 30293197

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveIn subjects with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) the functional state of the locus coeruleus and the subtle derangements in the finely tuned dopamine-noradrenaline interplay are largely unknown. The PET ligand (S,S)-[11C]-O-methylreboxetine (C-11 MRB) has been described to reliably bind noradrenaline transporters but long scanning protocols might hamper its use, especially in patients with PD. We aimed to assess the feasibility of reducing C-11 MRB scans to 30 min.MethodsTen patients with idiopathic PD underwent dynamic C-11 MRB PET (120 min duration) and brain magnetic resonance imaging. Model-based (i.e., simplified and multilinear reference tissue model 2) non-displaceable binding potentials (BP) of selected brain regions were analyzed for a 90 min scan protocol and compared with BP derived from static 30-min data with different starting times (30, 40, 50 and 60 min) after C-11 MRB injection. Intraclass correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis were used to explore the association between BP of different scan durations. Spearman's ρ served to describe the correlation of BP with demographic and clinical parameters.ResultsWith respect to kinetic models, BP50-80 and BP60-90 showed the best correlation in several brain areas (R2 range 0.95-98; p ConclusionsAn acquisition time of 30 min, starting 50 or 60 min after C-11 MRB injection, allows a reliable estimation of noradrenaline transporter binding values in Parkinsonian people. A short acquisition time can significantly reduce the discomfort of Parkinsonian patients and facilitate PET studies, especially in the medication-off-state.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.