SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Clinical characteristics and quality of life in Chinese patients with multiple system atrophy.

Brain Behav · 2018-10-30

DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1135PMID: 30378279

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectivesMultiple system atrophy (MSA) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that causes early sustained disability and poor health-related quality of life (HrQoL). The clinical features and their effects on the HrQoL of patients in China have received little attention in the research literature. We evaluated the clinical characteristics and HrQoL of Chinese patients with MSA.Materials and methodsA total of 143 patients with MSA from the Department of Neurology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, were enrolled in the study from March 2014 to May 2017. Basic demographic data, motor symptoms, non-motor symptoms, and HrQoL were assessed and compared with data from 198 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) who were matched by age, gender, and disease duration. Factors influencing the HrQoL of MSA patients were also analyzed.ResultsThe ratio of patients with predominant parkinsonism (MSA-P) and prominent cerebellar ataxia (MSA-C) was 95:48 among the 143 MSA patients. MSA-P patients had a longer disease duration (p = 0.002), higher levodopa equivalent daily dose (p ConclusionsThe results indicate that MSA-P patients have more severe motor impairment, hyposmia, depression, anxiety, cognitive impairment, and lower HrQoL than MSA-C patients. Depression, anxiety, degree of disability, and disease severity are predictors of poor HrQoL among Chinese patients with MSA.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.