SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Ultrasonication-based rapid amplification of α-synuclein aggregates in cerebrospinal fluid.

Sci Rep · 2019-04-12

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42399-0PMID: 30979935

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

α-Synuclein aggregates, a key hallmark of the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease, can be amplified by using their seeding activity, and the evaluation of the seeding activity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is reportedly useful for diagnosis. However, conventional shaking-based assays are time-consuming procedures, and the clinical significance of the diversity of seeding activity among patients remains to be clarified. Previously, we reported a high-throughput ultrasonication-induced amyloid fibrillation assay. Here, we adapted this assay to amplify and detect α-synuclein aggregates from CSF, and investigated the correlation between seeding activity and clinical indicators. We confirmed that this assay could detect α-synuclein aggregates prepared in vitro and also aggregates released from cultured cells. The seeding activity of CSF correlated with the levels of α-synuclein oligomers measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Moreover, the seeding activity of CSF from patients with Parkinson's disease was higher than that of control patients. Notably, the lag time of patients with Parkinson's disease was significantly correlated with the MIBG heart-to-mediastinum ratio. These findings showed that our ultrasonication-based assay can rapidly amplify misfolded α-synuclein and can evaluate the seeding activity of CSF.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.