SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Regional gray matter reductions associated with mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: A meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies.

Behav Brain Res · 2019-05-22

DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.111973PMID: 31128163

Check source for accessMeta-Analysis; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is inconclusively associated with regional gray matter (GM) abnormalities in Parkinson's disease (PD). We aimed to quantitatively evaluate whole-brain voxel-based morphometry (VBM) studies that have investigated brain GM changes in PD patients with MCI (PD-MCI). Seed-based d Mapping, a well-validated coordinate-based meta-analytic approach, was utilized. We included 20 VBM studies that reported 22 datasets containing 504 patients with PD-MCI and 554 PD patients without MCI (PD-NCI). The most reliable finding identified in this meta-analysis was that patients with PD-MCI exhibited greater GM atrophy in the left anterior insula than those with PD-NCI. Our findings further suggest that several moderators (age, gender, educational level, disease stage, severity of motor disability, and the severity of cognitive impairments) in PD-MCI individuals, as well as scanner field-strength, may drive heterogeneous GM changes across studies. GM abnormalities in the anterior insula, an important cognitive hub involved in switching between neural networks, contribute to understanding the neural substrates of MCI in PD, which may serve as a biomarker of PD-MCI.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.