SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Midnolin is a confirmed genetic risk factor for Parkinson's disease.

Ann Clin Transl Neurol · 2019-10-06

DOI: 10.1002/acn3.50914PMID: 31588691

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveGenetic analysis of patients with familial Parkinson's disease (PD) identified many causative genes. However, the majority of PD cases are sporadic, and the mechanisms of onset still remain unclear. Previously, we found that Midnolin (MIDN) is associated with PD in a Yamagata (Japan) cohort study and that MIDN regulates neurite outgrowth and Parkin expression in neuronal cells. In the present study, we aimed to replicate the genetic association between MIDN and PD in a large British population cohort.MethodsIn this replication study, we analyzed the copy number variations and single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the MIDN gene in a large British population on a case-control genome-wide association study dataset including 2,860 controls and 2,168 PD patients.ResultsThere was significant copy number loss in the MIDN gene with an odds ratio of 4.35 (P -16 ). Furthermore, there were many patients in both the British and Yamagata case groups who have a long spanning deletion. The odds ratio dramatically increased to 22.3 (P = 3.59 × 10-15 ) when a deletion spanning more than 50,000 bp was defined as the copy number loss. There were no significant differences between the controls and study cases for two relatively frequent single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs3746106 and rs3746107).InterpretationWe showed the strong genetic association of MIDN with PD development in a British population and in a Japanese population, suggesting MIDN is a confirmed and universal genetic risk factor for PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.