SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Models of multiple system atrophy.

Exp Mol Med · 2019-11-18

DOI: 10.1038/s12276-019-0346-8PMID: 31740682

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; review-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a neurodegenerative disease with diverse clinical manifestations, including parkinsonism, cerebellar syndrome, and autonomic failure. Pathologically, MSA is characterized by glial cytoplasmic inclusions in oligodendrocytes, which contain fibrillary forms of α-synuclein. MSA is categorized as one of the α-synucleinopathy, and α-synuclein aggregation is thought to be the culprit of the disease pathogenesis. Studies on MSA pathogenesis are scarce relative to studies on the pathogenesis of other synucleinopathies, such as Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. However, recent developments in cellular and animal models of MSA, especially α-synuclein transgenic models, have driven advancements in research on this disease. Here, we review the currently available models of MSA, which include toxicant-induced animal models, α-synuclein-overexpressing cellular models, and mouse models that express α-synuclein specifically in oligodendrocytes through cell type-specific promoters. We will also discuss the results of studies in recently developed transmission mouse models, into which MSA brain extracts were intracerebrally injected. By reviewing the findings obtained from these model systems, we will discuss what we have learned about the disease and describe the strengths and limitations of the models, thereby ultimately providing direction for the design of better models and future research.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.