SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Dopamine Transporter Density in <i>de novo</i> Parkinson's Disease Does Not Relate to the Development of Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesias.

J Neuroinflamm Neurodegener Dis · 2019-06-05

PMID: 31819926

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundIn Parkinson's disease (PD), the onset of levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LIDs) is difficult to predict. This study examines whether dopamine transporter (DAT)-specific SPECT imaging in de novo PD relates to later development of LIDs.Methods42 de novo unilateral PD participants received DAT-specific SPECT imaging with 123I-FP-CIT at time of diagnosis. At five years post-diagnosis, all PD patients were clinically evaluated and divided into two groups based on whether they had or had not developed LIDs. Fourteen gender- and age-matched healthy volunteers undertook 123I-FP-CIT SPECT imaging and were included as controls. A semi-quantification approach was used for the 123I-FP-CIT data using the occipital cortex as the reference region. We calculated specific binding ratios (SBR) for the caudate and putamen (posterior and anterior putaminal subregions). In parallel, we analysed our 123I-FP-CIT dataset with a voxel-based analysis approach.ResultsPD patients had significantly lower striatal 123I-FP-CIT SBR values in comparison to controls (ppp123I-FP-CIT SBR values were not statistically different between the two groups for all striatal regions (p>0.05). SPM voxel-based analysis did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05).Conclusion123I-FP-CIT SPECT imaging, performed at diagnosis in de novo early-stage PD could not differentiate patients who will develop LIDs within five years from those who will not.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.