SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Improvement of classification performance of Parkinson's disease using shape features for machine learning on dopamine transporter single photon emission computed tomography.

PLoS One · 2020-01-24

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228289PMID: 31978154

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveTo assess the classification performance between Parkinson's disease (PD) and normal control (NC) when semi-quantitative indicators and shape features obtained on dopamine transporter (DAT) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are combined as a feature of machine learning (ML).MethodsA total of 100 cases of both PD and normal control (NC) from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative database were evaluated. A summed image was generated and regions of interests were set to the left and right striata. Area, equivalent diameter, major axis length, minor axis length, perimeter and circularity were calculated as shape features. Striatum binding ratios (SBRputamen and SBRcaudate) were used as comparison features. The classification performance of the PD and NC groups according to receiver operating characteristic analysis of the shape features was compared in terms of SBRs. Furthermore, we compared the classification performance of ML when shape features or SBRs were used alone and in combination.ResultsThe shape features (except minor axis length) and SBRs indicated significant differences between the NC and PD groups (p ConclusionWe found that the circularity obtained from DAT-SPECT images could help in distinguishing NC and PD. Furthermore, the classification performance of ML was significantly improved using circularity in SBRs together.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.