SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Differential effects of Cu<sup>2+</sup> and Fe<sup>3+</sup> ions on in vitro amyloid formation of biologically-relevant α-synuclein variants.

Biometals · 2020-03-13

DOI: 10.1007/s10534-020-00234-4PMID: 32170541

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Alterations in metal ion homeostasis appear coupled to neurodegenerative disorders but mechanisms are unknown. Amyloid formation of the protein α-synuclein in brain cells is a hallmark of Parkinson's disease. α-Synuclein can bind several metal ions in vitro and such interactions may affect the assembly process. Here we used biophysical methods to study the effects of micromolar concentrations of Cu2+ and Fe3+ ions on amyloid formation of selected α-synuclein variants (wild-type and A53T α-synuclein, in normal and N-terminally acetylated forms). As shown previously, Cu2+ speeds up aggregation of normal wild-type α-synuclein, but not the acetylated form. However, Cu2+ has a minimal effect on (the faster) aggregation of normal A53T α-synuclein, despite that Cu2+ binds to this variant. Like Cu2+, Fe3+ speeds up aggregation of non-acetylated wild-type α-synuclein, but with acetylation, Fe3+ instead slows down aggregation. In contrast, for A53T α-synuclein, regardless of acetylation, Fe3+ slows down aggregation with the effect being most dramatic for acetylated A53T α-synuclein. The results presented here suggest a correlation between metal-ion modulation effect and intrinsic aggregation speed of the various α-synuclein variants.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.