SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

A computational model-based analysis of basal ganglia pathway changes in Parkinson's disease inferred from resting-state fMRI.

Eur J Neurosci · 2020-07-03

DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14868PMID: 32558966

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Previous computational model-based approaches for understanding the dynamic changes related to Parkinson's disease made particular assumptions about Parkinson's disease-related activity changes or specified dopamine-dependent activation or learning rules. Inspired by recent model-based analysis of resting-state fMRI, we have taken a data-driven approach. We fit the free parameters of a spiking neuro-computational model to match correlations of blood oxygen level-dependent signals between different basal ganglia nuclei and obtain subject-specific neuro-computational models of two subject groups: Parkinson patients and matched controls. When comparing mean firing rates at rest and connectivity strengths between the control and Parkinsonian model groups, several significant differences were found that are consistent with previous experimental observations. We discuss the implications of our approach and compare its results also with the popular "rate model" of the basal ganglia. Our study suggests that a model-based analysis of imaging data from healthy and Parkinsonian subjects is a promising approach for the future to better understand Parkinson-related changes in the basal ganglia and corresponding treatments.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.