Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
ObjectivesThis placebo-controlled, randomized study evaluated the efficacy and safety of opicapone 25-mg and 50-mg tablets in Japanese levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations.MethodsJapanese adults (n = 437, age 39-83 years) with Parkinson's disease (United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society criteria) received opicapone 25-mg (n = 145), opicapone 50-mg (n = 145), or placebo (n = 147) tablets over the double-blind treatment period (14-15 weeks). The primary efficacy assessment was change in OFF-time; secondary efficacy assessments included OFF/ON-time responders (≥1 hour change from baseline), total ON-time, ON-time with and without troublesome dyskinesia, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale.ResultsThe least squares mean (standard error) change in OFF-time from baseline to the last visit was -0.42 (0.21) hour for the placebo group, -1.16 (0.22) hour for the opicapone 25 mg group, and -1.04 (0.21) hour for the opicapone 50 mg group. The percentage of ON-time responders, changes in total ON-time/ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale II (at OFF) all showed statistically significant improvements versus placebo for both opicapone tablet doses (P ConclusionsIn Japanese patients, both opicapone 25 and 50 mg were significantly more effective than placebo with no dose-dependent difference in efficacy, and both doses were well tolerated. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.