SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Changes of Amide Proton Transfer Imaging in Multiple System Atrophy Parkinsonism Type.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2020-09-30

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.572421PMID: 33192464

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Multiple system atrophy (MSA), an atypical parkinsonism of alpha-synucleinopathies, has no specific biomarker of diagnosis. According to different combinations of symptoms, MSA can be classified as parkinsonism-type MSA (MSA-P) and cerebellar-type MSA (MSA-C; Watanabe et al., 2018). Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging is by far the most studied chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging for its sensitivity to mobile protons and peptides in tissues. We hypothesize that APT imaging may be a feasible biomarker of MSA-P. Twenty MSA-P patients and 20 age-matched normal controls were enrolled in this study and underwent MR exams on a 3.0-T MR scanner. Magnetization transfer spectra at 3.5 ppm were acquired at two transverse slices of the head, including the midbrain and the basal ganglia. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the asymmetrical magnetization transfer ratio (MTRasym) difference between MSA-P patients and normal controls. The APT MTRasym values of MSA patients in the red nucleus (RN) (SN; P = 0.000), substantia nigra (P = 0.000), thalamus (P = 0.000), and putamen (P = 0.013) were significantly higher than those in normal controls. There was a negative correlation between APT MTRasym and the score of part III of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (R = -0.338, P = 0.044) in the putamen, while there was a positive correlation between the APT MTRasym and the rate of motor symptom progression (R = 0.406, P = 0.017) in the RN. These findings suggest that APT MTRasym changes are found and may be of value in the diagnosis of MSA-P.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.