Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
RationaleThe Pisa syndrome (PS) is defined as a kind of reversible postural deformity which causes a lateral trunk flexion of 10 degrees or more. A prevalence of approximately 7.4% to 10.3% of patients with Parkinson disease (PD) also have PS. Though unbalanced function of the basal ganglia network and impaired visual-spatial functions including parietal cortices in PS is known, the pathophysiology of PS remains to be unclear.Patient concernsA 67-year-old male patient with PD visited our Rehabilitation outpatient department because of his trunk which involuntarily deviated to the left side when he stood up.DiagnosesBased on the history, physical examination, X-ray images, Tc-99m brain TRODAT-1 single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and regional cerebral perfusion Tc-99m ethyl cysteinate dimer SPECT, the patient was diagnosed with PD with PS.InterventionsThe patient refused our recommendation of admission for pharmaceutical treatment due to personal reasons and was only willing to accept physical training programs at our outpatient department.OutcomesWe arranged functional neuroimaging of the brain to survey possible neurologic deficits. The patient's images of ethyl cysteinate dimer SPECT and TRODAT SPECT showed abnormalities, including hypoperfusion and diminished dopamine transporter uptake, in the areas of the basal ganglia network and other brain regions.LessonsBased on previous literature and the imaging of our patient, we hypothesize that PS results from unbalanced function of the basal ganglia network and impaired visual-spatial functions of bilateral parietal cortices.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.