SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Applicability of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) imaging in Parkinson's disease.

Sci Rep · 2021-03-09

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84862-xPMID: 33750844

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

To evaluate the significance of motion artifacts in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and healthy controls. In this prospective, cross-sectional study subjects with medicated PD (ON) and healthy, age- and gender-matched volunteers were recruited. Participants underwent specific ophthalmological examinations, including OCTA. Angiograms of the superficial retinal capillary plexus were evaluated for the type and frequency of artifacts using a validated motion artifact score (MAS). A total of 30 PD patients (60 eyes), average disease duration of 9.61 ± 5.55 years, and 30 matched, healthy controls (60 eyes) were recruited. Twenty percent of all eyes had an eye disease, unknown to the participant, with a significant impact on OCTA results. After cleansing the dataset by excluding subjects with confounding ocular comorbidities 42 eyes of 28 PD patients and 53 eyes of 29 healthy controls were further evaluated. Overall MAS and all five subtypes of motion artifacts were comparable without significant differences between groups. OCTA can be used in treated PD patients (ON) without a significant increase in motion artifacts. Nevertheless, special attention should be paid to image quality during the acquisition of OCTA data, for which an experienced OCTA operator is useful.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.