SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Sniffing Out Cognitive Decline in Patients with and without Evidence of Dopaminergic Deficit.

Clin Park Relat Disord · 2019-10-17

DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2019.09.002PMID: 33969286

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundDepletion of dopamine is a major neuropathological feature of Parkinson's disease; however, 15% of patients with parkinsonian motor symptoms have neuroimaging evidence of intact dopaminergic function. Recent work has demonstrated that such patients without dopaminergic deficit are at a greater risk of cognitive impairment yet have intact olfaction relative to parkinsonian patients with dopaminergic deficit.ObjectivesGiven the high discriminatory power of olfaction assessments in movement disorders, the current study sought to determine whether olfaction dysfunction differentially predicted cognitive decline in patients with or without dopaminergic deficit.MethodsData were obtained from the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative. The total sample included 401 patients with and 51 patients without dopaminergic deficit, based on neuroimaging scans, and 175 healthy controls. Participants were categorized into non-impaired or impaired olfaction groups based on performance on the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test. Participants were administered the Montreal Cognitive Assessment twice (baseline and two-year follow-up), and change scores were calculated to examine changes in cognition over time.ResultsWithin the impaired olfaction groups, participants without dopaminergic deficit had lower cognitive scores than participants with dopaminergic deficit and healthy controls at baseline. Group differences were not significant at follow-up; rather, impaired baseline olfaction predicted cognitive decline across all study participants.ConclusionsFuture studies are needed to assess whether the profile of motor and non-motor symptoms in patients without dopaminergic deficit, including olfaction, are deserving of their own syndrome, or whether individual patients may fit better under alternative, existing diagnoses.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.