SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Effectiveness and safety of moxibustion for Parkinson disease: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medicine (Baltimore) · 2021-06-01

DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000026256PMID: 34115018

Open accessreview-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundParkinson disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease among middle-aged and elderly people. Clinically, it is a movement disorder characterized mainly by static tremors, kinesia, myotonia, and postural balance disorder. In recent years, an increasing number of clinical reports on moxibustion therapy for PD have been published. Despite this, no systematic review of moxibustion therapy for PD has been undertaken.MethodsTwo reviewers will search the following 7 English and Chinese databases online: the Cochrane Library; PubMed; EMBASE; the China National Knowledge Infrastructure; the Wan Fang databases; the China Science and Technology Journal Database; and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. Reviewers will search each electronic database for studies published from journal inception to May 2021. Two reviewers will independently conduct clinical study inclusion, data extraction, and risk bias assessment. Any differences in the above process will be resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. If the data are sufficient, RevMan software 5.3 (Cochrane Community, London, UK) will be used for the meta-analysis of the extracted data.ResultsIn this systematic review, the effectiveness and safety of moxibustion therapy in PD treatment will be evaluated.ConclusionThis systematic review may provide further evidence to encourage clinicians to use moxibustion in the treatment of PD.Inplasy registration numberINPLASY202140097.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.