SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Psychosocial needs of patients and spouses justify a position of psychosocial health professionals in the multidisciplinary care for Parkinson's disease.

Clin Park Relat Disord · 2020-07-03

DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2020.100064PMID: 34316645

Open accessbrief-report; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionLiving a life with Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a challenge for both patients and spouses. Patients have to cope with an increasing limitation in all domains of their daily life and spouses need to adjust to these changes. The focus of this study is on exploring, both quantitatively and qualitatively, the psychosocial needs of both patients with PD and spouses.MethodsAn online survey with 11 themes, related to dealing with a chronic disease, was sent by an email to patients and spouses and two focus groups were planned, one with patients and one with spouses. Data from the survey were quantitatively analysed and audiotapes from the focus groups were transcribed verbatim and combined with notes.ResultsPercentages of relevance are higher than 50% for all the themes, whereas those of the need for and received support are all lower than 50%. Focus groups revealed a negative image of psychosocial therapy and associations with failure, but also difficulties in signalling problems by professionals, little attention for spouses and limited access to specialized psychosocial care.ConclusionBased on this exploration, there appears to be a threshold to ask for psychosocial support on the one hand and to find the right professional on the other hand. A permanent position for psychosocial health professionals in the multidisciplinary Parkinson teams and networks may close the gap between 'supply and demand'.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.