SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of hydrogen inhalation for Parkinson's disease: a pilot study.

Neurol Sci · 2021-07-28

DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05489-4PMID: 34319514

Open accessbrief-report; Randomized Controlled Trial; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundOxidative stress is involved in the progression of Parkinson's disease (PD). Recent studies have confirmed that molecular hydrogen (H2) functions as a highly effective antioxidant in animal models of PD. A placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical pilot study was conducted to assess the efficacy of hydrogen gas inhalation in Japanese patients with PD on treatment with levodopa.MethodsTwenty participants fulfilling the Movement Disorder Society criteria were enrolled. Participants inhaled 6.5 (0.1) vol% hydrogen gas in 2 L/min of mixed air or placebo air for 16 weeks, twice a day for 1 h.ResultsFive participants were excluded due to deviation from the protocol of the total duration of inhalation th week between the group that inhaled hydrogen gas and the group that inhaled placebo air (Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). No adverse events were seen. The compliance to the protocol-based duration of inhalation time in all participants decreased with the elderly participants, the higher daily dose of levodopa, and the higher PDQ-39 items on emotions (n = 20, p ConclusionThis pilot study revealed that the inhalation of molecular hydrogen gas was safe, but did not show any beneficial effects in patients with PD.Trial registrationUMIN ID: 000,039,217 (October 6, 2018).

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.