SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Time-Specific Pattern of Iron Deposition in Different Regions in Parkinson's Disease Measured by Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Front Neurol · 2021-08-04

DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.631210PMID: 34421781

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Studies have shown the spatial specificity of cranial iron deposition in different regions in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the time-specific patterns of iron deposition are not yet clear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the time pattern of iron variations and its clinical relevance in multiple gray matter nuclei in PD using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). Thirty controls and 33 PD patients were enrolled, namely, 11 cases of early stage of PD (ESP) and 22 cases of advanced stage of PD (ASP) according to the Hoehn-Yahr stages. The iron content in the subcortical nuclei covering substantia nigra (SN), red nucleus (RN), head of the caudate nucleus (CN), globus pallidus (GP), and putamen (PT) was measured using QSM, and the clinical symptoms of PD were evaluated by various rating scales. The QSM values in SN, RN, GP, and PT significantly increased in PD patients compared with the controls. Further subgroup comparison with the controls indicated that the iron content in SN and GP (paleostriatum) gradually elevated in the whole disease duration and was related to clinical features. While the iron content in RN and PT (neostriatum) only elevated significantly in ESP patients, further iron deposition was not obvious in ASP patients. Our study confirmed that QSM could be used as a disease biomarker and could be suitable for longitudinal monitoring. However, considering the temporal characteristics of iron deposition in neostriatum, iron deposition in the neostriatum should be paid more attention in the early stage of the disease, even in the preclinical stage, in future research.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.