SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Prediagnostic expressions in health records predict mortality in Parkinson's disease: A proof-of-concept study.

Parkinsonism Relat Disord · 2022-01-01

DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.12.015PMID: 34998147

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionThe relationship of prodromal markers of PD with PD mortality is unclear. Electronic health records (EHRs) provide a large source of raw data that could be useful in the identification of novel relevant prognostic factors in PD. We aimed to provide a proof of concept for automated data mining and pattern recognition of EHRs of PD patients and to study associations between prodromal markers and PD mortality.MethodsData from EHRs of PD patients (n = 2522) were collected from the Turku University Hospital database between 2006 and 2016. The data contained >27 million words/numbers and >750000 unique expressions. The 5000 most common words were identified in three-year time period before PD diagnosis. Cox regression was used to investigate the association of expressions with the 5-year survival of PD patients.ResultsDuring the five-year period after PD diagnosis, 839 patients died (33.3%). If expressions associated with psychosis/hallucinations were identified within 3 years before the diagnosis, worse survival was observed (hazard ratio = 1.71, 95%CI = 1.46-1.99, p ConclusionsAutomated mining of EHRs can predict relevant clinical outcomes in PD. The approach can identify factors that have previously been associated with survival and detect novel associations, as observed in the link between poor survival and prediagnostic pain. The significance of early pain in PD prognosis should be the focus of future studies with alternate methods.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.