SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Clinical Characteristics of Minor Hallucinations in Chinese Parkinson's Disease Patients.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2022-01-20

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.723405PMID: 35126085

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundPsychotic symptoms are common in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the clinical characteristics of PD psychosis (PDP) have been rarely reported in Chinese PD patients. We aimed to categorize PDP in a PD cohort and its relationship to other clinical characteristics.MethodsA total of 149 Chinese PD patients were consecutively enrolled, and idiopathic PD patients were recruited in the study. The symptoms of PDP were assessed with the enhanced Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms in PD. Then, the patients were classified into a PD-control group, isolated minor hallucination (MH) group, and complex MH group, and clinical and demographic data of different groups were compared.ResultsParkinson's disease psychosis was present in 40.3% (60/149) of our patients. The most common PDPs were MHs, present in 32.9% (49 of 149) of the cohort. Compared to patients without MHs, patients with MHs were older, had a longer disease duration, a higher levodopa equivalent daily dose, more severe motor symptoms, dyskinesia, a higher rate of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorders, frontal lobe function impairments, and a higher percentage of cognitive impairment. Logistic regression analysis showed that advanced Hoehn-Yahr stage [odds ratio (OR): 2.697, p = 0.007)] and frontal lobe function impairment (OR: 0.684, p = 0.003) were independent risk factors for MHs.ConclusionMHs were frequent non-motor symptoms in PD patients. It was associated with increased motor and non-motor symptom burdens and reduced quality of life. MHs have been called "minor," but they have major clinical and prognostic implications and need early screening.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.