SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Phase II Study of Foliglurax in Parkinson's Disease.

Mov Disord · 2022-02-26

DOI: 10.1002/mds.28970PMID: 35218231

Open accessClinical Trial, Phase II; brief-report; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundAgents targeting the metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 have emerged as a potentially attractive new class of drugs for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD).ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of foliglurax in reducing off time and dyskinesia in patients with PD.MethodsThis was a 28-day, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of foliglurax 10 and 30 mg as adjunct to levodopa in 157 randomly assigned patients with PD and motor complications.ResultsAlthough dose-dependent decreases in daily awake off time were apparent following treatment with foliglurax, the change from baseline to day 28 in off time (primary endpoint) and dyskinesia (secondary endpoint) did not improve significantly compared with placebo for either foliglurax dose. Treatment with foliglurax was generally safe, and there were no relevant safety signals.ConclusionsThere was no evidence in this study that foliglurax has efficacy in improving levodopa-induced motor complications in PD. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.