NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundMild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD-MCI) is associated with faster cognitive decline and conversion to dementia. There is uncertainty about the role of β-amyloid (Aβ) co-pathology and its contribution to the variability in PD-MCI profile and cognitive progression.ObjectiveTo study how presence of Aβ affects clinical and cognitive manifestations as well as regional brain volumes in PD-MCI.MethodsTwenty-five PD-MCI patients underwent simultaneous PET/3T-MRI with [18F]flutemetamol and a clinical and neuropsychological examination allowing level II diagnosis. We tested pairwise differences in motor, clinical, and cognitive features with Mann-Whitney U test. We calculated [18F]flutemetamol (FMM) standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) in striatal and cortical ROIs, and we performed a univariate linear regression analysis between the affected cognitive domains and the mean SUVR. Finally, we investigated differences in cortical and subcortical brain regional volumes with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).ResultsThere were 8 Aβ+ and 17 Aβ- PD-MCI. They did not differ for age, disease duration, clinical, motor, behavioral, and global cognition scores. PD-MCI-Aβ+ showed worse performance in the overall executive domain (p = 0.037). Subcortical ROIs analysis showed significant Aβ deposition in PD-MCI-Aβ+ patients in the right caudal and rostral middle frontal cortex, in precuneus, in left paracentral and pars triangularis (p p = 0.038). Cortical regions with higher amyloid load correlated with worse executive performances (p ConclusionsPresence of cerebral Aβ worsens executive functions, but not motor and global cognitive abilities in PD-MCI, and it is not associated with middle-temporal cortex atrophy. These findings, together with the observation of significant proportion of PD-MCI-Aβ-, suggest that Aβ may not be the main pathogenetic determinant of cognitive deterioration in PD-MCI, but it would rather aggravate deficits in domains vulnerable to Parkinson primary pathology.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.