SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

MicroRNA as Candidate Biomarkers in Atypical Parkinsonian Syndromes: Systematic Literature Review.

Medicina (Kaunas) · 2022-03-26

DOI: 10.3390/medicina58040483PMID: 35454322

Open accessSystematic Review; review-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background and Objectives: Multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) are rare atypical parkinsonian syndromes, characterized by motor and cognitive symptoms. Their clinical diagnosis is challenging because there are no established biomarkers. Dysregulation of microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) has been reported to serve an important role in neurodegenerative diseases. However, the miRNA profiles of MSA and PSP patients are rarely reported. The aim of this study was to critically review the role of miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers to differentiate these atypical parkinsonian disorders and their role in disease pathogenesis. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed was conducted up to February 2022 according the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: A total of 15 studies were analyzed. Three studies have shown that miR-9-3p, miR-19a, miR-19b, and miR-24 are potential biomarkers for MSA. In two studies, miR-132 was downregulated, whereas miR-147a and miR-518e were upregulated in the brain tissue of PSP patients. Conclusions: The potential of miRNA is still uncertain as a potential differential diagnostic marker to identify these disorders. Pre-analytical and analytical factors of included studies were important limitations to justify the introduction of miRNAs into clinical practice.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.