SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Binding Stability of Antibody-α-Synuclein Complexes Predicts the Protective Efficacy of Anti-α-synuclein Antibodies.

Mol Neurobiol · 2022-04-22

DOI: 10.1007/s12035-022-02824-4PMID: 35460053

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Spreading of alpha-synuclein (αSyn) may play an important role in Parkinson's disease and related synucleinopathies. Passive immunization with anti-αSyn antibodies is a promising method to slow down the spreading process and thereby the progression of synucleinopathies. Currently, it remains elusive which specific characteristics are essential to render therapeutic antibodies efficacious. Here, we established a neuronal co-culture model, in which αSyn species are being released from αSyn-overexpressing cells and induce toxicity in a priori healthy GFP-expressing cells. In this model, we investigated the protective efficacy of three anti-αSyn antibodies. Only two of these antibodies, one C-terminal and one N-terminal, protected from αSyn-induced toxicity by inhibiting the uptake of spreading-competent αSyn from the cell culture medium. Neither the binding epitope nor the affinity of the antibodies towards recombinant αSyn could explain differences in biological efficacy. However, both protective antibodies formed more stable antibody-αSyn complexes than the non-protective antibody. These findings indicate that the stability of antibody-αSyn complexes may be more important to confer protection than the binding epitope or affinity to recombinant αSyn.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.