SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Safety and Efficacy of Cell Transplantation on Improving Motor Symptoms in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Front Hum Neurosci · 2022-05-06

DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.849069PMID: 35601911

Open accessSystematic Review; systematic-review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundThe past four decades have seen the growing use of tissue or cell transplants in Parkinson's disease (PD) treatment. Parkinson's cell therapy is a promising new treatment; however, efficacy of cell transplantation for Parkinson's disease are entirely unclear.ObjectiveTo conduct a meta-analysis and a systematic review of the efficacy of cell therapy in patients with PD.MethodsA systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 10 studies were performed to assess the efficacy of cell therapy in Parkinson's patients. To achieve this, we compared the change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II and III scale scores to baseline and assessed the incidence of transplant-related adverse events. The MINORS score and the I2 index were applied to evaluate the quality of studies between-study heterogeneity, respectively.ResultsThe literature search yielded 10 articles (n = 120). The improvement in motor function based on the UPDRSIII assessment was -14.044 (95% CI: -20.761, -7.327) (p p ConclusionThe present findings demonstrate important clues on the therapeutic effect of cell therapy in alleviating motor impairment and daily living ability in PD patients.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.