Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundThere remains a scarcity of literature regarding COVID-19 and its neurological sequelae. This study highlights Parkinsonism as a post-COVID-19 sequela and helps us understand a possible link between the two.MethodsA literature search covering relevant databases was conducted for studies reporting the development of Parkinsonism in patients recovering from COVID-19 infection. A quality assessment tool developed by The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for the assessment of case reports was utilized. Fisher's exact test was used to explore the factors associated with COVID-19 and Parkinsonism as its complication.ResultsTen studies were included in our study. The median age of patients was 60.0, with an interquartile range of 42.5-72.0. There were 8 males (61.5%) patients, and 53.8% of cases were reported to have at least one comorbidity. Cogwheel rigidity was the most common symptom of Parkinsonism in 11 patients. While the most standard treatment modality used was Levodopa in 76.9% of cases. Using the Fisher's Exact test, it was identified that 10 patients (76.9%) with bradykinesia made a full recovery.ConclusionDespite presumed "recovery" from COVID-19, patients still face a wide range of neurological complications. One of these complications presenting as Parkinsonism requires health care professionals to be on the lookout for the long-term effects of COVID-19. Hence, our study provides information on the possible likely hood of a link between COVID-19 and the development of Parkinsonism as post-COVID neurological sequelae.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.