Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
While machine learning (ML) methods may significantly improve image quality for SPECT imaging for the diagnosis and monitoring of Parkinson's disease (PD), they require a large amount of data for training. It is often difficult to collect a large population of patient data to support the ML research, and the ground truth of lesion is also unknown. This paper leverages a generative adversarial network (GAN) to generate digital brain phantoms for training ML-based PD SPECT algorithms. A total of 594 PET 3D brain models from 155 patients (113 male and 42 female) were reviewed and 1597 2D slices containing the full or a portion of the striatum were selected. Corresponding attenuation maps were also generated based on these images. The data were then used to develop a GAN for generating 2D brain phantoms, where each phantom consisted of a radioactivity image and the corresponding attenuation map. Statistical methods including histogram, Fréchet distance, and structural similarity were used to evaluate the generator based on 10,000 generated phantoms. When the generated phantoms and training dataset were both passed to the discriminator, similar normal distributions were obtained, which indicated the discriminator was unable to distinguish the generated phantoms from the training datasets. The generated digital phantoms can be used for 2D SPECT simulation and serve as the ground truth to develop ML-based reconstruction algorithms. The cumulated experience from this work also laid the foundation for building a 3D GAN for the same application.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.