Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Background and objectivesDementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) is a heterogeneous disease, with variable signs and symptoms across multiple domains. We aimed to identify associations with rate of change in cognition, everyday functioning (IADL) and quality of life (QoL).MethodsWe included 121 DLB patients (69 ± 6 yrs, 14%F, MMSE: 25 ± 3) in our prospective cohort (follow-up 2 ± 1 yrs). We described progression of symptoms and cognitive decline over time. Mixed models were used to investigate whether changes in symptoms were associated to changes in IADL (FAQ), QoL (QoL-AD) and caregiver burden (ZBI). Last, we investigated whether baseline symptoms and biomarkers predicted decline in cognition (MMSE), IADL (FAQ) and QoL (QoL-AD).ResultsParkinsonism and RBD were most frequently present early in the disease course, while hallucinations were more likely to develop in a later stage. MMSE (annual change β ± SE = -2.06 ± 0.23), QoL-AD (-1.03 ± 0.20), and FAQ (3.04 ± 0.30) declined over time. Increasing severity of clinical symptoms was associated to increases in FAQ, QoL-AD and caregiver burden. Baseline clinical symptoms were not predictive for decline in these outcomes. By contrast, AD co-pathology (CSF pTau/Aβ42 ratio) was associated to steeper decline in MMSE (-1.23 ± 0.54). Medial temporal atrophy (-0.81 ± 0.26) and global cortical atrophy (-0.73 ± 0.36) predisposed for decline in QoL-AD.ConclusionsOur findings imply that underlying disease processes, rather than clinical symptomatology aid in predicting decline. These findings are relevant for treatment strategies and the development of DLB specific outcome measures.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.