SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Topological disruption of high-order functional networks in cognitively preserved Parkinson's disease.

CNS Neurosci Ther · 2022-12-05

DOI: 10.1111/cns.14037PMID: 36468414

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

AimsThis study aimed to characterize the topological alterations and classification performance of high-order functional connectivity (HOFC) networks in cognitively preserved patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), relative to low-order FC (LOFC) networks.MethodsThe topological metrics of the constructed networks (LOFC and HOFC) obtained from fifty-one cognitively normal patients with PD and 60 matched healthy control subjects were analyzed. The discriminative abilities were evaluated using machine learning approach.ResultsThe HOFC networks in the PD group showed decreased segregation and integration. The normalized clustering coefficient and small-worldness in the HOFC networks were correlated to motor performance. The altered nodal centralities (distributed in the precuneus, putamen, lingual gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, motor area, postcentral gyrus and inferior occipital gyrus) and intermodular FC (frontoparietal and visual networks, sensorimotor and subcortical networks) were specific to HOFC networks. Several highly connected nodes (thalamus, paracentral lobule, calcarine fissure and precuneus) and improved classification performance were found based on HOFC profiles.ConclusionThis study identified disrupted topology of functional interactions at a high level with extensive alterations in topological properties and improved differentiation ability in patients with PD prior to clinical symptoms of cognitive impairment, providing complementary insights into complex neurodegeneration in PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.