SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

A comparison of methods to suppress electrocardiographic artifacts in local field potential recordings.

Clin Neurophysiol · 2022-12-02

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.11.011PMID: 36543611

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveLocal field potential (LFP) recordings from deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes are often contaminated with electrocardiographic (ECG) artifacts that hinder the detection of disease-specific electrical brain activity.MethodsThree ECG suppression methods were evaluated: (1) QRS interpolation of the Perceive toolbox, (2) template subtraction, and (3) singular value decomposition (SVD). LFPs were recorded with the Medtronic PerceptTM PC system in nine Parkinson's disease patients with stimulation OFF ("OFF-DBS"; anode disconnected) and ON at 0 mA ("ON-DBS 0 mA"; anode connected). Findings were verified with simulated ECG-contaminated time series.ResultsECG artifacts were present in 10 out of 18 ON-DBS 0 mA recordings. All ECG suppression methods drastically reduced artifact-induced beta band (13-35 Hz) power and at least partly recovered the beta peak and beta burst dynamics. Using external ECG recordings and lengthening artifact epoch length improved the performance of the suppression methods. Increasing epoch length, however, elevated the risk of flattening the beta peak and losing beta burst dynamics.ConclusionsThe SVD method formed the preferred trade-off between artifact cleaning and signal loss, as long as its parameter settings are adequately chosen.SignificanceECG suppression methods enable analysis of disease-specific neural activity from signals affected by ECG artifacts.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.